Doug Burgum, Secretary of the Interior
Last updated: 21 November 2025
Summary
Doug Burgum serves as Secretary of the Interior in the second administration of Donald J. Trump. A former software executive and two-term governor of North Dakota, he now oversees a department that manages hundreds of millions of acres of federal and tribal land, offshore resources and major conservation programs. His tenure has been defined by a strong push to expand fossil fuel and mineral extraction on public land, an attempt to link energy production to national security and technological competitiveness, and an ongoing clash with environmental groups and climate advocates.
Supporters present Burgum as a pragmatic executive who understands both markets and energy infrastructure. Critics argue that his agenda represents a dramatic rollback of environmental safeguards and a deepening of fossil fuel dependence at a time of accelerating climate risk.
Background and Rise
Douglas James Burgum was born in 1956 in Arthur, North Dakota. He grew up in a farming community and maintained ties to family agricultural enterprises even as he moved into business and technology. After earning a bachelor’s degree from North Dakota State University and an MBA from Stanford University, he mortgaged inherited farmland in the 1980s to invest in Great Plains Software, a small Fargo-based start-up. He became the company’s president and later sold it to Microsoft for roughly 1.1 billion dollars in 2001. He then served in senior roles at Microsoft Business Solutions and went on to found the Kilbourne Group, a real-estate development firm, and co-found the venture capital firm Arthur Ventures.
Burgum entered electoral politics in 2016, running for governor of North Dakota as a Republican and winning in a landslide. He was re-elected in 2020, presiding over a state economy heavily tied to the Bakken oil patch. As governor he promoted both fossil fuel expansion and an aspirational goal of making North Dakota “carbon neutral” by 2030, relying on carbon capture, underground storage and agricultural sequestration rather than rapid reduction in drilling.
In 2023 Burgum briefly ran for the 2024 Republican presidential nomination, positioning himself as a pro-energy Midwestern conservative. He later exited the race and endorsed Trump, who in turn praised Burgum as a potential senior official in a new administration. After Trump’s return to office, Burgum was nominated to serve as Secretary of the Interior and confirmed by the Senate with broad bipartisan support.
Role and Influence in the Administration
The Department of the Interior manages roughly half a billion acres of federal land, large tracts of offshore territory and key responsibilities for tribal relations, wildlife protection and national parks. As Secretary, Burgum directs how much of that land is open to drilling, mining, grazing, recreation and conservation.
From the outset, Burgum has been tasked with transforming the department into a central driver of the administration’s “energy dominance” agenda. Reporting on his nomination and confirmation emphasised that Trump gave him a clear mandate to prioritise drilling and energy production on public lands, reversing restrictions adopted under the Biden administration.
His early actions reportedly included department-wide directives calling for reduced regulation, faster permitting and the expansion of oil, gas and mineral leasing. Burgum has also been tapped to chair or play a leading role in new energy-policy councils, integrating Interior’s decisions with national security planning and economic strategy.
Policy Priorities and Orientation
Fossil fuel expansion and permitting reform
Burgum’s signature priority is expanded fossil fuel production on public lands and offshore areas. He has publicly argued that the United States cannot maintain economic and technological leadership, particularly in energy-intensive fields like artificial intelligence, without a large increase in reliable baseload power from coal, oil and natural gas.
Under his leadership, the Interior Department has moved to increase lease sales in oil-producing states and offshore regions, streamline permitting for extraction projects and roll back some restrictions introduced during the Biden years. He frames these measures as essential for jobs, national security and energy affordability.
Energy, AI and national security
Burgum has drawn attention for linking energy production directly to global competition over artificial intelligence. He warns that if the United States does not expand fossil fuel-powered electricity generation, it risks losing an “AI arms race” to China due to power-grid constraints and the energy demands of data centers. Critics see this as a justification for further fossil fuel build-out that downplays climate impacts.
Tribal relations and public lands
As governor, Burgum clashed with federal regulators over control of land and energy development but also promoted partnerships with Native American tribes around oil and gas production. As Interior Secretary, reporting indicates that he has exempted some Indigenous-related programs from wider cuts to diversity-focused initiatives, a decision that drew measured praise from certain tribal leaders even as many remain wary of expanded drilling.
Climate framing
Burgum continues to present carbon capture, storage technology and agricultural sequestration as ways to reconcile expanded fossil fuel use with climate goals, an approach that some environmental groups criticise as unrealistic or industry-friendly.
Controversies and Criticism
Environmental backlash
Burgum’s nomination triggered immediate opposition from environmental and conservation organisations, which warned that he would sacrifice public lands “on the altar of the fossil fuel industry’s profits.” They point to his record of suing the Interior Department multiple times as governor to loosen rules on drilling, flaring and land management, and they argue that his confirmation represents “capturing the regulator” by industry interests.
Advocacy groups fear large-scale expansion of drilling in ecologically sensitive areas, rollback of protections for endangered species and weakening of habitat conservation programs. They also note that rapid permitting reforms can reduce opportunities for public input and tribal consultation.
Litigation history and revolving roles
Before joining the cabinet, Burgum’s administration in North Dakota sued the Interior Department on multiple occasions, challenging federal regulations on oil and gas, federal minerals and land-use rules. Now, as head of the department he once litigated against, he has broad authority to reshape or rescind those same rules. Investigative pieces have highlighted this shift as an example of a revolving dynamic in which a frequent plaintiff becomes the chief policymaker.
Culture-war positions and civil-rights concerns
During his presidential bid and his time as governor, Burgum faced criticism over his support for a “religious refusal” bill that opponents said could enable discrimination against LGBTQ+ people, and statements casting transgender rights debates as part of a broader culture war. Civil-rights advocates argue that such positions may carry over into his approach to Interior’s responsibilities, especially in areas affecting tribal and rural communities.
Rhetoric about the prior administration
In interviews and public appearances, Burgum has accused the Biden administration of punishing energy-producing states “more than Iran,” citing a long list of executive actions affecting Alaska and other regions. He contends that restrictions on drilling and infrastructure projects undermined domestic energy security while benefiting adversaries. Critics say these comments exaggerate the impact of prior policies and obscure the environmental rationale behind them.
Public Image and Outlook
Burgum’s public image combines his background as a self-made tech entrepreneur with a strong pro-fossil fuel stance and a technocratic style. Supporters portray him as a competent executive who understands both the private sector and the realities of energy infrastructure, arguing that his leadership will unlock economic value from public lands and strengthen U.S. strategic autonomy.
Opponents describe him as an industry ally whose agenda prioritises short-term extraction profits over long-term environmental health, climate stability and equitable stewardship of public resources. They warn that expanding drilling now could lock the United States into decades of additional emissions and undermine global climate commitments.
His legacy as Secretary of the Interior will likely hinge on measurable outcomes in energy production, investment in public lands, tribal relations and climate impacts. If his policies deliver economic gains without severe environmental damage, proponents will claim vindication. If they lead to increased pollution, legal conflict and degraded ecosystems, critics will point to his tenure as a warning about the costs of treating public lands primarily as energy assets.
Sources
U.S. Department of the Interior — “Secretary Doug Burgum”
Encyclopaedia Britannica — “Doug Burgum”
The Guardian — “Environmental groups alarmed as Doug Burgum picked for US interior secretary”
ProPublica — “Doug Burgum Is Set to Lead the U.S. Agency He Sued as Governor”
Reuters — “Senate confirms North Dakota’s Burgum as Trump interior secretary”
Financial Times — “Trump’s ‘energy tsar’ says US will lose ‘AI arms race’ without fossil fuels”
Newsweek — “Everything Doug Burgum Has Said About Abortion and Trans Rights”
Navigation
Return to Rogues hub
Return to Felon of the United States homepage